Kevin Ezell and the SBC North American Mission Board Are Accused of Being Bullies. In the Meantime, Where is the Abuse Database (Day 112 and counting?)

The sun still rises each day. NASA

“Bullying is not going to make your mom proud. It’s not going to pay your bills. It’s nothing to be proud of.” DeSean Jackson


Let’s start at the end of this article by Baptist News. More Baptist leaders cite pattern of bullying from Ezell and NAMB.

Ezell and NAMB’s communication office have a longstanding policy of not responding to press inquiries about controversial issues. If a response is received, BNG will publish it.

Kevin Ezell heads the North American Mission Board of the SBC. According to the NAMB website:

NAMB mobilizes Southern Baptist churches for their next step in missions in North America; whether that’s in church planting, compassion ministry or evangelism training and outreach.

Having served since 2010, Kevin has led NAMB and Southern Baptists to plant more than 10,000 churches during his tenure. These church plants are responsible for nearly 10% of all baptisms in the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) and, by 2030, one-third of all SBC churches will have been planted in the last 20 years.

With a laser focus on evangelism, NAMB’s 3 Circles tool has been distributed to and downloaded by more than two million people in the last seven years, making it the most used evangelism resource in NAMB’s history.

In cooperation with the International Mission Board, NAMB leads the SBC’s compassion ministry called Send Relief. Operating 20 ministry centers across the U.S. and Canada and offering mission trips and training opportunities, Send Relief is connecting people in need with people who care, all with the goal of leading people to faith in Christ.

Prior to joining NAMB, Kevin served as the senior pastor of churches in Texas, Illinois and his native Kentucky.

Ezell takes the UK’s royal family’s approach to embarrassing or uncomfortable news. “Never explain.”

The NAMB has been getting lots of press recently, and much of it is negative and unnecessary. More Baptist leaders cite pattern of bullying from Ezell and NAMB.

In Dee’s opinion, what are some problems with the NAMB?

  • The NAMB will not release how much their organization’s leaders are paid. Dee suspects people might be startled at the salaries of these leaders. Why isn’t an entity of the SBC accountable to the people who tithe?
  • The pewsitters are so used to being told that the salaries and expenses of the NAMB are secret for a “reason.” I suspect the reason is that the spending is often used to control those unfortunate enough to be under the control of the secretive NAMB.
  • The NAMB appears to be the “go-to” slot for pastors who have had enough of being pastors and want to earn the big bucks from the tithers.
  • The organization will not say how much they spend on church plants or buying houses for church planters (I’ve heard some of those houses are very nice).
  • How many houses does the NAMB own? Are they investing in these homes for real estate purposes?
  • How many of the church plants fail?
  • Is the NAMB biased in favor of larger churches, often failing to support the efforts of churches with a membership of 100 or less?

What are the problems of coordinating efforts between the SBC, the local SBC state entities, and the NAMB?

time massive changes were rolling out of NAMB’s headquarters in Alpharetta, Ga., as NAMB President Kevin Ezell changed the partnership agreements between the national body and the state conventions, pulling back previously shared funding for church planting to use in a national strategy controlled solely by NAMB.

That drew criticism from a number of state convention executives, particularly of smaller conventions without the financial resources to go it alone.

In my opinion, the SBC is getting big enough to fail. Decisions are made by the Executive Committee, the NAMB, the local state organizations, etc. These groups are all chasing the same pot of money. This mixed-up approach to making changes in the structure, combined with little accountability, is bound to cause friction and outright rebellion. I do not blame the state conventions that appear gobsmacked by Kevin Ezell’s decisions that only the NAMB will control church planting if that church plant wants SBC bucks.

They have been told that the big bucks are now in the hands of Ezell, who appears to have control of the secretive NAMB bucks.

Is the NAMB attempting to blackball anyone questioning its ability to remove funding from the state conventions?

Has the NAMB and the Executive Committee ever put out a position paper about their plans to radically decrease funding to the state conventions? Did they ever carefully give a time frame for the assumption of these duties? If so, they should be published somewhere for the members of the SBC to see them. If not, then this is no way to run a business.

It appears that Ezell and NAMB leadership attempted to get state convention leaders fired, using unChristianlike business practices.

In a relatively short period of time, Gilstrap went from being someone pursued by Ezell to a staff position in Alpharetta to being someone who couldn’t get a phone call returned, the former state leader said.

Gilstrap was pushed out of the state leadership role in 2014 after he was branded as uncooperative with Ezell and NAMB.

Ezell, who later would call McRaney a “nutcase” and urge other organizations not to hire him as a consultant or speaker, did the same thing to Gilstrap, both Gilstrap and another witness have testified.

Larry Cheek, associational missionary for Stone Mountain Baptist Association of Churches in Georgia, has publicly stated that Ezell called him in 2016 and urged him not to hire Gilstrap as a church planting strategist.

Did Kevin Ezell attempt to blackball state leaders who didn’t consent to the new policy?

We have been following the efforts of Will McRaney, who Kevin Ezell allegedly blackballed. It appears the same thing was happening to Gilstrap.

Eventually, he was informed by his own trustees that he would be evaluated because he was unable to cooperate with NAMB. That charge came to a head when Gilstrap was invited to a trustee’s home and asked to resign.

“They said to me that NAMB had said I was too difficult to work with,” he recounted.

And that label stuck with him for years, even as he interviewed for the part-time job as leader of the Urban Atlanta Church Planting network led by Stone Mountain Association with three other associations. It was then he learned from Cheek that Ezell was working against him being hired..”

Final thoughts

I don’t care if the SBC wants the NAMB to invest in casinos in Mississippi so long as they present a position paper to all SBC members to read. I don’t like any organization that claims to be Christian but hides their business model and money from the faithful.

Last year, I wrote Do You Think Your Hard Earned SBC Donations Are Being Used in the Way You Intended? Read This to Be Disabused of Your Naive Notions. Here is what I had to say about the NAMB.

Do you trust these guys? I don’t. Show us the financials. All of them!
Which genius at the SBC set up a NAMB that didn’t have to show any financial information to the SBC faithful? This would be worth a loud laugh amongst those who have completed at least one class in an MBA program. I wonder, are the boys at the NAMB  laughing at the SBC faithful?

In the meantime, people should consider directly sending their money to missionaries and groups where they can see what is being accomplished. In other words, groups that emphasize transparency and accountability. Trying to figure out where the money goes in the SBC is like watching sausage being made. It turns the stomach of the uninitiated.

Stop giving money to the SBC until you know how the big bucks are spent. Don’t be suckers because it seems to me that the tithing faithful are being played.


And what about the well-funded abuse implementation task force?

Here is the last report, on September 18, 2023. Why do I get the feeling things are not going well? Maybe it’s about time to keep track of days. We are still waiting 112 days from the last post and about  1+ years into the process.

This update serves as a representation of the collective efforts of the Abuse Reform Implementation Task Force (ARITF) in our commitment to enhance safety within Southern Baptist Churches. We aim to create environments that are secure, both from abuse and for survivors, guided by our shared responsibility as followers of Jesus.

As Mike Keahbone said in his report tonight to the trustees of the Executive Committee:

“Our main goal is to help BC churches become safer places for everyone-places that are safe from abuse and safe for survivors. We have a strong biblical mandate to do this and do it right. I hope this update will show you that this task force is committed to doing everything we can to further that goal.”

An Overview of Ministry Check

A significant development in our ongoing efforts is the creation of Ministry Check. This initiative, which we introduced several weeks ago, is not merely a tool or a website but a comprehensive platform designed to enable Southern Baptist Churches to prevent abuse by sharing crucial information.

  • Our intention is to assist churches in helping one another prevent abuse, acknowledging that they often rely on reference checks when hiring candidates for ministry positions.

  • However, this process is limited by the information available.

  • Ministry Check will address this limitation by facilitating access to information about individuals who have been credibly accused of sexual abuse, beginning with those who have been criminally convicted or found liable in civil court for sexual abuse. 

  • We are well underway in the process of launching Ministry Check, and we anticipate announcing the official launch date soon.

Additional Updates:

Apart from Ministry Check, our efforts extend to providing churches with essential tools and resources to prevent and

respond to abuse effectivelv.

  • Our team has recently collaborated with national entities, state convention partners, local associations, and pastors to develop a comprehensive Ministry Toolkit.

  • These resources will be readily accessible on our website, SBCabuseprevention.com, which we envision as the central hub for abuse reform within Southern Baptist Churches and entities.

  • We are pleased to highlight the commendable progress achieved by many of our state conventions in the field of abuse reform.

    • The ARITF has initiated communication with all 41 state conventions to explore opportunities for strengthening and supporting their ongoing initiatives in this critical area.

Lastly, in response to the directives from the Messengers in Anaheim, the ARITF is actively formulating plans to recommend a long-term option to assist with abuse prevention and reform across all Southern Baptist churches and entities.

  • Given the gravity of our responsibility and the current needs of our convention, we intend to recommend a proposal that will resource and assist churches in preventing and responding to abuse and provide the necessary oversight for the Ministry Check process

  • We look forward to sharing further details about this recommendation as it takes shape in the coming months.

My hope is fading…No wonder folks don’t trust the SBC leaders.

Comments

Kevin Ezell and the SBC North American Mission Board Are Accused of Being Bullies. In the Meantime, Where is the Abuse Database (Day 112 and counting?) — 33 Comments

  1. Larry Cheek, associational missionary for Stone Mountain Baptist Association of Churches in Georgia, has publicly stated that Ezell called him in 2016 and urged him not to hire Gilstrap as a church planting strategist.
    *** google Larry Cheek. He covers sexual abuse link https://julieroys.com/woman-accuses-georgia-sbc-churches-protecting-predatory-pastors/. Link: https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/religion/2023/03/14/georgia-sbc-officials-how-they-handled-cases-of-abuse-and-reform/69895812007/

  2. My hope is fading…No wonder folks don’t trust the SBC leaders.

    Hope?
    I strongly suspect that most of the leaders in the SBC are counting on memories fading, too. And, I know that many, many SBCers are more than happy to oblige.
    Hey, the Annie Easter offering boxes will be out in the church foyers soon!!! And, most folks aren’t even curious about how the money is handled and spent.

  3. So do they have a list anywhere of all their new church plants and pastors? I note a fair number of churches are carefully concealing their SBC connections.

  4. “I do not blame the state conventions that appear gobsmacked by Kevin Ezell’s decisions that only the NAMB will control church planting if that church plant wants SBC bucks.”

    IMO, NAMB is planting reformed theology not Gospel churches. Ezell was Al Mohler’s pastor before being tapped to lead NAMB … think about it.

  5. Nancy2(aka Kevlar): the Annie Easter offering boxes will be out in the church foyers soon

    The last time I saw those at a church we were visiting I nearly cried … knowing that those funds would be used to finance reformed church plants, a theology that is contrary to the non-Calvinist belief and practice of millions of Southern Baptists. The SBC pew doesn’t have a clue.

  6. Nancy2(aka Kevlar): how the money is handled and spent.

    Well, if an org can:
    1. make power moves like the silencing of your women with their duct tape theology;
    2. violate your children, minors, youth, and women (Christa Brown, Jules Woodson, etc.);
    … they can probably then

    3. take your money and covertly misuse it without batting an eye.

    A trifecta of power, vice, and profit may be the new creed.

  7. Erp: a fair number of churches are carefully concealing their SBC connections

    That’s one of the things which has disturbed me most about SBC’s church planting program under Ezell. Besides being planted by mostly New Calvinist recruits fresh out of seminary, the young reformers then hit the road with new SBC churches without telling members that they are affiliated with SBC! You ‘may’ discover their SBC connection tucked away in a remote corner of their websites, but they certainly don’t promote the denomination. Meanwhile, the young pastors enjoy church planting funds sent to them from the pockets of millions of hard-working non-Calvinist Southern Baptists, who are expanding the New Calvinist movement under the SBC umbrella without knowing it! It’s the darnedest thing I’ve ever seen.

  8. Ava Aaronson: take your money and covertly misuse it without batting an eye

    Describes the New Calvinist takeover of the SBC in a nutshell. All SBC entities (seminaries, mission agencies, publishing house, church planting program) are now solidly under the control of New Calvinists. They have accomplished that mission strategically and under the radar of SBC’s non-Calvinist majority in 45,000+ churches across America … SBC’s Founders Ministries describe it as a “Quiet Revolution.” There are three types of folks in the SBC: (1) those who plan to make things happen, (2) those you make things happen, and (3) those who wonder “What happened?!” The New Calvinists occupy the first two categories … SBC’s mainline non-Calvinist membership, the latter.

  9. “Is the NAMB biased in favor of larger churches, often failing to support the efforts of churches with a membership of 100 or less?”

    Most (80%) SBC churches have a membership of 200 or less … most of those are rural … most of those are non-Calvinist in belief and practice. However, they faithfully contribute to national SBC entities through their tithes and offerings by sending a percentage of church revenue to the Cooperative Program to oil the big wheels, Annie Armstrong offering for North American missions, and Lottie Moon offering for international missions. The New Calvinist leaders at these entities then decide how/where those funds are distributed. Meanwhile, the little churches (comprising most of SBC’s membership) continue to send hard-earned dollars up the pyramid because they trust their leaders to do the right thing … they need to desperately think that through these days.

  10. Max: IMO, NAMB is planting reformed theology not Gospel churches.

    Who needs Christ when you have CALVIN?

  11. Erp: I note a fair number of churches are carefully concealing their SBC connections.

    Lesson being taught:
    Christians are Liars and Deceivers.

  12. Max, anyone in one of those few remaining non Calvinist SBC churches should take those Lottie Moon or Annie Armstrong envelopes home with them, fill them with cash for whatever amount they want to give to missions, and SIT ON IT UNTIL A NEED PRESENTS ITSELF. When you see the struggling family needing a new coat for a fast growing young man, buy him one. When you see someone struggling to put food on the table, silently buy some food, and leave it quietly and secretly but securely on their porch. When the local school kids are hyped up about an upcoming field trip, but some families cannot afford to send the kids contact the school and quietly scholarship it. Or find the nearest school that has a meaningful and active science fair (not all are good) and scholarship some awards. See a senior on a very limited social security check struggling to choose between meds, food, or heat? Contact their utility company if you know which one it is and quietly pay a bit on their account.

    Lottie and Annie would be proud of you. Jesus will approve. And the middle men who think the dollars should go for finer houses for themselves can go pound sand.

  13. dee: They are concealing all sorts of things.

    Yeah, like the Great Commission Resurgence Task Force records … sealed in 2010 for 15 years (until 2025). What back room deals were hidden from SBC members? … what darkness lurks in that document? … will the task force members all be retired from SBC when the seal is broken? … will anyone remember the records at all? … who is worthy to break the seal?

    “And I saw a mighty angel proclaiming in a loud voice, “Who is worthy to break the seals and open the scroll?” (Revelation 5:1)

  14. Max: Great Commission Resurgence Task Force

    It should be clear by now that recent years have been a Calvinist Resurgence within SBC not a Great Commission Resurgence.

  15. Agreed Linda! God will present others needs to you and you can act with His money, instead of giving it to these big organizations. There is a young couple at church who I found out has 2 cars that both badly need repairs. The husband has quite a commute to work, so at least 1 car is desperately needed in good working order. They are going to get a gift card to a grocery store in the mail this week with a note that they have been prayed for and the hope is that whatever they were going to spend on groceries for them and their kids, they could instead put towards car repairs. It is what Jesus would do (1 John 3:16-18). Now if only the people of these congregations would get a clue.

  16. linda: take those Lottie Moon or Annie Armstrong envelopes home with them, fill them with cash for whatever amount they want to give to missions, and SIT ON IT UNTIL A NEED PRESENTS ITSELF. When you see the struggling family needing a new coat for a fast growing young man, buy him one. When you see someone struggling to put food on the table, silently buy some food, and leave it quietly and secretly but securely on their porch. When the local school kids are hyped up about an upcoming field trip, but some families cannot afford to send the kids contact the school and quietly scholarship it. Or find the nearest school that has a meaningful and active science fair (not all are good) and scholarship some awards. See a senior on a very limited social security check struggling to choose between meds, food, or heat? Contact their utility company if you know which one it is and quietly pay a bit on their account.

    Lottie and Annie would be proud of you. Jesus will approve. And the middle men who think the dollars should go for finer houses for themselves can go pound sand.

    Some really good ideas, Linda 🙂 ….including that the middle men can go pound sand. 🙂

    ….and maybe if the middle men went to pound sand, they could TRY to do it legally, and maybe donate money and / or time to someone in need. 🙂 Although the middle men might need to be reminded that they’re NOT the person in need. 🙂

  17. JJallday: God will present others needs to you and you can act with His money, instead of giving it to these big organizations.

    IMO, given the condition of some of these organizations, it would be better stewardship of your funds to give directly to those in need or local missions you know and trust … rather than sending your hard-earned money to the great unknown of denominational spending.

  18. researcher: the middle men might need to be reminded that they’re NOT the person in need

    Yep, that would do them some good! Too many dollars are siphoned off as they move up the denominational pyramid. Giving to a mission fund may end up giving to the mission director instead.

  19. JJallday,

    Max,

    Amen. There are homeless shelters, drug rehab centers, free medical clinics …… lots of orgs.

    ***(Ft. Campbell/Oak Grove/Clarksville area was recent hit by a tornado. Some of the people lost everything and are still living in shelters…… many of them them are off-post military families…. local fire, rescue, police, etc spent a lot of money they didn’t have in the aftermath…… I’m sure all of us know where there are people in need.)***
    …..Check the local schools and see if some needy students are in debt on lunch money.
    It’s cold, y’all – I’m sure some people need winter coats and heavy socks.

  20. Max: Yep, that would do them some good! Too many dollars are siphoned off as they move up the denominational pyramid. Giving to a mission fund may end up giving to the mission director instead.

    All them guys are gonna’ hafta’ give account one day.

  21. Nancy2(aka Kevlar): Check the local schools and see if some needy students are in debt on lunch money.
    It’s cold, y’all – I’m sure some people need winter coats and heavy socks.

    Regarding giving to SBC mission funds, Ronnie Armani Floyd once said “Together, we can do more than we can ever do by ourselves.” While that certainly has some truth to it, it is ‘you’ (generic you) not the SBC who will help Little Susie down the street with lunch money and Little Billy across town with a new winter coat … as God leads ‘you’ to be His hands to those in need.

    “God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit … and He went around doing good … because God was with Him” (Acts 10:38)

  22. Max: Muff Potter: ethereal theology …

    … seldom gets in the trenches with hurting people

    Too busy floating around in Fluffy Cloud Heaven like a Shade in Hades.
    Or an Uploaded Consciousness Algorithm in the Post-Singularity Cloud.

  23. Max: oo many dollars are siphoned off as they move up the denominational pyramid. Giving to a mission fund may end up giving to the mission director instead.

    “This is the State above the Law,
    The State that exists for the State alone;
    (This is the gland at the back of the jaw,
    An answering lump by the collar-bone)…”
    — Rudyard Kipling, 1919, “A Death-Bed”

  24. JJallday: Now if only the people of these congregations would get a clue.

    Too busy being Holy and Righteous.
    The Gospel of Personal Salvation and ONLY Personal Salvation is as Selfish as anything from the typer of Ayn Rand.

  25. From the article:

    “After I got started and they started unveiling all that they were going to do and all the shifts, it was evident pretty quickly that centralized control was kind of what they were after,” Gilstrap said. “It didn’t sit well with me.

    Did I call it or what?

    And that photo makes me soooo angry. My ex-manager from NAMB told me it was my fault we got fired (for a completely fabricated issue that I still don’t really understand). No, the problem was that we had the wrong body parts.

  26. ishy: we had the wrong body parts

    Any female who was a student or employee at an SBC institution when the New Calvinist movement swept in was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

  27. Max,

    SBC who AND neocals who?

    Max: Great Commission Resurgence

    Are hand washing and hand wringing connected?

    ishy,

    In some boarding schools or camps, everyone had “wrong” body parts. To certain denominations, there were “wrong” body parts in married parishioners’ beds since the 1920s.