
Photo by cottonbro studio at pexels
“To those who abuse: the sin is yours, the crime is yours, and the shame is yours. To those who protect the perpetrators: blaming the victims only masks the evil within, making you as guilty as those who abuse. Stand up for the innocent or go down with the rest.” ― Church of Lies
Burk Parsons
Pay me well and quit causing trouble.
Burk Parsons, no relation to Dee, has been convicted, once again. Here is my post from March 2025. Burk Parsons May Not Be Flagitious, But He’s in Trouble Once Again. When we last left Parsons, he was about to be tried by the Central Florida Presbytery.
In that, we learned that Parsons was tried over a non-flagitious matter, and he repented in 2019. (I love the words these presbyteries use.) It seems Parsons was accused of some sort of spiritual abuse and hurt a bunch of his church members. He confessed and repented of said abuse. One would think he would learn his lesson. However, Parsons appears to be a member of the Calvinista brigade and as such, is the pastor to be paid well and obeyed. Just in case you think I’m being facetious, this was in the original post. Here is how he views himself and his church members. (The video is in the post.)
This video of the 2024 Ligonier Conference features Parsons and another well-compensated pastor, Steve Lawson. Listen to Parsons from mark 24.26-31.55.
One of the main reasons that pastors leave ministry is because of people having expectations, just as you were talking about, Bob, that are not rooted in Scripture. Pastors are not administrators. They are not fundmentally your counselor. They are not fundamenatally the social organizer of the church or of the community, Pastors are not your mother, your father, or your best frriend. Pastors are not deacons. Much of the work we expectour pastors to do is the work of the diacinate. So many of the things that we expect of our pastors are not the primary work of the pastor. …What can people do? They can pray for their pastors, pay them well, take care of their families, allow them to be properly cared for so that they are truly free from the cares of having to take care of their families. Pay them well, compeensate the mwell, love them, encourage them, and quit causing trouble.
It appears that Parsons did not change, which should come as no surprise to those who follow our “spiritual betters.”
Parsons was convicted of 3 out of 5 counts.
This time, Parsons was convicted by the Central Florida Presbytery. The Aquila Report posted Central Florida Presbytery Judicial Commission Announces Verdict In Burk Parsons Case.
The three charges for which Parsons was found guilty were:
(1) being harsh, ungentle, and unkind to those under his care or with whom he interacts;
(2) not being a humble servant leader but instead “lording it over others” (i.e., autocratic) and being domineering, contentious, and quarrelsome/pugnacious in his leadership so that those in his care and in his “leadership orbit” were intimidated, bullied, and/or afraid; and (
3) slandering and/or demeaning other servants and churches of our Lord.
He was found to be autocratic, pugnacious (my pugs take umbrage), and overall, a general bully.
His punishment?
“The Commission voted unanimously to indefinitely suspend TE Parsons from office, but not from the sacraments, citing insufficient signs of repentance and a need for pastoral reflection about his calling as an elder. During this time TE Parsons cannot participate in the duties of an elder, including preaching, teaching, administering the sacraments, and participating in the church courts. The suspension remains in effect until satisfactory evidence of repentance is provided.”
Folks, it’s guys like this that I think about when I tell you to never, ever, ever sign a membership contract, which some think is a covenant. It’s not. It’s a control mechanism. Imagine if a bully had control over your discipline…Guess who wouldn’t be taking communion (unlike Pastor Burk).
They believe he’ll be back.
Ministry Watch posted Burk Parsons Found Guilty by Church Commission, Suspended From Office.
The commission noted that Parsons pleaded guilty to similar charges in 2019 and was admonished at that time.
“This, along with subsequent reports of relational harm and unhealthy leadership environment, taking place both before and since the 2019 event, indicate an unresolved pattern, and thus led the Commission to discern that indefinite suspension was the appropriate censure,” the report stated.
While Parsons’ suspension from office is a “serious step,” the commission said it is not a final or permanent one.
“Restoration remains a real and prayerful possibility if he ‘shall exhibit for a considerable time such an eminently exemplary, humble and edifying life and testimony as shall heal the wound made by his scandal,’” the commission said, quoting from the PCA’s Book of Church Order.
Ligonier Ministries loves him just the way he is, which may say something, but I won’t.
Parsons gets paid to be some guru with Ligonier Ministries, and that looks like it’ll continue.
Update: Ligonier Ministries acknowledged the verdict of the judicial commission, noting that “[t]hese are not criminal matters nor severe moral failings, such as sexual or financial sins.”
“Dr. Parsons remains a valued colleague and board member, and continues as Executive Editor for Tabletalk magazine. Ligonier seeks to honor the church and its disciplinary authority at local, regional, and national levels, so our board will await the outcome of the appeal and the actions of the Session of Saint Andrew’s Chapel. Please pray for the PCA courts, Dr. Parsons and his family, Saint Andrew’s Chapel, and all involved. We trust the Lord to lead His church in righteousness and peace. Our commitment to producing faithful discipleship resources is unchanged,” the Ligonier Care Team email stated.
But the best part is next…
Parsons ain’t going anywhere. He intends to appeal, and the Presbytery needs to wake up. Parsons is a problem.
Parsons does not seem to be concerned that he gets dragged in front of his betters in the Prebytery every now and then. He’s the man. Ministry Watch posted Prosecutor of Burk Parsons Speaks About Process, Evidence in Church Trial.
The evidence against Parsons was and is concerning.
One mother, who sought help from Parsons several years ago during a time of tremendous family pain, said Parsons told her the pain was caused by her being a “bad mother.” She weeps even now when she retells that story, Klemm said.
…Of the 19 prosecution witnesses, Klemm said four were teaching elders, four were ruling elders, some were on staff at St. Andrew’s, some were on staff at Ligonier, and some were church members.
The witness testimony dated back as far as 2007 and demonstrated a pattern of domineering, unkind, and harsh behavior, Klemm said.
He saw pain in the eyes of those who had been wounded by their shepherd, and he knew their pain was real. In fact, Covenant Presbyterian Church in Palm Bay, where Klemm is senior pastor, has made funds available for specific victims to receive counseling.
Let me get this straight. Kleem’s church will pay for the counseling, not Parsons’ church? Boys (it’s all boys in this denomination), any guy who has this many accusations about him is trouble. I believe he will not get better. He hasn’t repented, which is a clue.
Parsons has given notice to the judicial commission that he plans to appeal the verdict and resulting censure of an indefinite suspension from carrying out his duties as a teaching elder.
The Aquila Report reported problems with his repentance.
citing insufficient signs of repentance
Final thoughts
- Burk Parsons appears to have a serious problem.
- He doesn’t think he has a problem because he is appealing the decision.
- Does the prebytery have the cojones to deal with a problem that has been going on for years?
- People are getting hurt. I’ve been hearing about him for years. Parsons doesn’t seem to give a hoot. Does the Presbytery?
- I wonder how many people who were hurt had also signed that confounded membership contract and were on the receiving end of his issues.
- Is being a jerk as cool a category as being flagitious?
Brady Boyd steps down.
I remember when I was writing my post about Cinday’s abuse by Robert Morris that I was wondering what sort of effect this would have on how the church deals with the sexual abuse of children. The response was far more reaching than I expected. I am grateful that Cindy has seen Robert Morris indicted and has now filed a lawsuit against Morris and Gateway for more than 1 million dollars
One year after I wrote that post, I am now watching the far-reaching implications of Morris’s abuse. Brady Boyd was a pastor at Gateway and became an overseer at New Life Church in Colorado. He denied knowing the age of Cindy Cleminshire when Robert Morris molested her. This was Ted Haggard’s old church. Yikes!
Julie Roys posted BREAKING: Pastor Brady Boyd Resigns, Following Allegations He Knew Decades Ago About Robert Morris’s Child Abuse. It appears that Boyd did know.
“Recently, Brady has insisted that he was unaware until 2024 that Miss Clemishire was 12 years old at that time that Morris had abused her in the 80s,” the elders stated. “We believe this to be inaccurate. Brady also made statements in his public address to the congregation on June 8 that the Board of Elders know to be inaccurate.”
The elders added that “trust is the currency of leadership. When Brady recently told our congregation inaccurately that he was unaware of certain details regarding Morris’s past abuse, trust was broken.”
This news comes 14 days after The Roys Report (TRR) first published evidence that Boyd knew at least 18 years ago that Dallas-based Gateway Church founder Robert Morris had sexually abused Clemishire from age 12 to 16. Despite this alleged knowledge, Boyd made Morris an overseer at New Life in 2007.
Any guess who outed him? His former leader, Robert Morris. Ouch!
The evidence indicating that Boyd knew about Morris’s past sex crimes were included in court documents filed recently by Morris in his lawsuit with Gateway concerning retirement funds.
Here is the statement of Boyd’s ‘resignation’ by New Life Church leadership, followed by the video.
20250622-NLC-Statement-on-the-Departure-of-Brady-Boyd
Just moments ago, New Life Church’s statement on the departure of Brady Boyd. pic.twitter.com/TGVFEbkGeK
— Justice For Cindy Clemishire (@4CndyClemishire) June 22, 2025
Three final thoughts
- I am willing to wager that more folks are going to be implicated in the cover-up of Robert Morris’s abuse of a 12-year-old girl. People get deposed during a court case. If it is found that the person being deposed isn’t telling the truth, they will face claims of perjury, which is a felony offense in most states.
- Morris liked to talk a lot about demons. He wanted an easy way out of this – Freedom Ministry and all that jazz. Morris needs to take a good, hard look at himself in the mirror because he is the one who molested Cindy.
- May justice reign for Cindy and her family!
Ligonier Ministries acknowledged the verdict of the judicial commission, noting that “[t]hese are not criminal matters nor severe moral failings, such as sexual or financial sins.”..
Humm…. Interesting standards… I guess it is “not that bad” if you are just a “@#$&” as long as there is no hanky panky or stieeling $$$$…
It is amazing they put out such as statement….
And I am suppose to listen to these clowns???
Jeffrey Chalmers(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
My understanding is that St. Andrew’s is considering leaving the PCA.
Meredith McKinney(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Jeffrey Chalmers,
Luke 6:36 – You must be compassionate, just as your Father is compassionate.
Revile – To speak in an insulting, abusive, or contemptuous manner towards someone. The use of harsh, bitter, and demeaning language with the intent to injure, denigrate, or demoralize another person.
Reviler – a person who uses words to damage and control someone or insult their character or reputation.
A reviler is someone who speaks abusively or contemptuously about or toward another person. They use harsh, insulting language to attack or denigrate someone. They engage in destructive speech.
A reviler is a verbal abuser and verbal abusers blame their victims.
The term implies a person who habitually engages in this kind of verbal abuse.
Jesus had some choice words about this type of person.
Matthew 5:22 (ESV)
“. . . . If you call someone an idiot, you are in danger of being brought before the court.
If you curse someone, you are in danger of the fires of hell.”
“Out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks” (Matthew 12:34). A reviler reveals what is in their heart, and it is the heart that God searches and judges (Jeremiah 17:9–10).
Paul also had some choice words for revilers – twice even!
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (ESV):
Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor REVILERS, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
1 Corinthians 5:11 (ESV)
I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, REVILER, drunkard, or swindler – not even to eat with such a one.
Ligonier claims no “severe moral failings” but his apparent persistent behavior and attitude towards others is listed in company with several other “severe moral failings”.
Clowns indeed – and apparently not reliable judges of character. By supporting him, has Ligonier also taken on the mantle of “reviler”?
Maybe don’t sit down to dinner with them either.
Afterburne(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Parsons, like many other abusers, have become that way through a high sense of entitlement and a chronic lack of self-reflection. Consequences are necessary, but that does not mean they will gain insight (and therefore repent) because of them. They will need to walk a long and hard road for any meaningful change to occur, and Parsons is clearly running in the opposite direction.
Valerie Stewart(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Afterburne,
Unfortunately, as we seem to almost continually observe, many “Christian orgs” are “just as bad” as the abusive individual……. For many years, I saw signs of it, but i let these orgs make me feel the problem was me…. But no longer!
Jeffrey Chalmers(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Perhaps we need to add another word to Dee’s “what do words mean” series — “conscience.”
The church court convicted Parsons of misconduct, but Parsons disagrees that his conduct was wrong. His conscience does not align with the consensus of the church court.
The thought occurs that it might be really useful to have diagnostic methods to ascertain, in young candidates for ministry, the level of function and the accuracy of their conscience (and empathy, which is useful as a way of intuiting how one comes across to others). Failing that, a fallback might be comprehensive lists of permitted and prohibited behaviors (a sort of procedural “external conscience” to assist vocational ministers who, through no fault of their own, have subnormal functioning conscience). Within Presbyterian church system, ministers make vows, the breaking of which is grounds for removal (after trial) from office; perhaps these vows could include promises to comply with the exhaustive list of behavioral prohibitions.
Samuel Conner(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Right? Looks like there’s a pretty low bar to clear for acceptable behaviour in their own organisation. They didn’t even put in an obligatory sentence or two about how abuse is bad, or the victims matter, or even that Parsons is sorry if someone may have been offended.
I think this will come back to bite them. Since this is not Parsons’ first trial for the same behaviours, they can’t say they didn’t know there was a problem. Some of the prosecution witnesses were from Ligonier. This may expose them to retaliation, and Ligonier to workplace lawsuits if something goes wrong.
I do appreciate that the presbytery were willing to convict on a list of behaviours that actually sounds like standard operating procedure for many pastors today. I hope the bit about possible restoration is a theoretical statement, but they are well aware he won’t change. As Dee said, he seems to have no problem being dragged through church courts from time to time, & jumping up to appeal his suspension doesn’t exactly show ‘signs of repentance’.
Christie24(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Christie24,
As mentioned above… The Ligonier sure seems to ignore allot of Scripture… Why would I ever trust anything out of their mouth?????
Jeffrey Chalmers(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
It is noted in the official record that the indefinite suspension is because “ TE Parsons had previously pled guilty to similar charges in 2019 and received admonition at that time. This, along with subsequent reports of relational harm and unhealthy leadership environment, taking place both before and since the 2019 event, indicate an unresolved pattern, and thus led the Commission to discern that indefinite suspension was the appropriate censure. This decision by the Commission was unanimous and was accompanied by prayer for TE Parson’s repentance, the glory of God, and the peace and purity of the church.”
This is his earlier apology in 2023 -“ You have to understand, my lack of gentleness, my harshness at times, that’s, that’s my
character, OK, that’s who I am. My personality and my character are not nat…, I am not
naturally gentle, I am not naturally kind. I don’t do well in little ‘chit chat’ conversations because
I don’t know what to say and I think I’m going to probably hurt someone’s feelings at some point.
You have to understand in many ways when, and this is just to help you understand a little bit, I
didn’t ask to be a preacher. I didn’t ask to be a leader. I didn’t ask to be in a position of
proclaiming, defending, rebuking, exhorting. And, if it were my decision, and if I could do it, I
wouldn’t be any of it. I wouldn’t be a pastor. I wouldn’t be a preacher. I wouldn’t have to stand up
here and have to proclaim. I wouldn’t have to get in people’s faces and their business and meddle
with them and deal with their sins and deal with the problem of people’s… I wouldn’t do it. I
would rather have a completely different personality and completely different set of
characteristics and do something else.
Those of you in this congregation, those of you whose are friends of mine, those of you I know,
those of you men, especially that are humble, and kind and sweet, I wish I were like you. This is
who I am. Everywhere else, I am just trying to be normal. Everywhere else, I am trying to just be
the gentle, sweet, person that I am not naturally.
I am naturally not gentle, and so that came out a little bit last week. I hear everything. I see
everything. I see when people are nodding off. I see when someone has got to go to the bathroom
again. I hear every noise; I hear everything up here. And I was grateful, I was grateful about 20
years ago when there was a phone that went off, this is in the old, old sanctuary. Some of you
were here, you remember. And another phone off in the middle service and I got after the folks –
and it was 20 years ago and a man in our church who was here during the first service called me
and told me that it was only one person who did that. But it was a much-needed correction and
rebuke.
You have to understand dearly beloved we all suffer with these things and deal with these things
or struggle with these things but some of us including me struggle with the a lot more than many
of you would like to know and my friends and my family know this and I have to remind them
time to time while it is difficult to put up with me and to live with me, it’s much harder being me.
But I am grateful for your kindness and grateful for your love and your forgiveness. I am grateful
for your understanding. You know, we all know, and kids you who are here, kids, your parents
and my kid’s parents your pastor are not perfect, and I know you know that. That’s why we need
to be a people who are regularly forgiving each other because without it we wouldn’t have a
friend. Without forgiveness we would have family. Withour forgiveness we wouldn’t … and I
know some of you right now are probably saying “ah, we didn’t need to hear all that.” You know,
well, I needed to say it. And I hope that you understand, and I hope that you appreciate that and
thank you for your listening this morning”
Lowlandseer(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Lowlandseer,
His apology sounds like a blend of “I Was Born This Way” and “Pity Poor Poor Me”.
The latter being one of the most common characteristics of a Sociopath.
Headless Unicorn Guy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Because it’s SCRIPTURAL (Seventies term for today’s “Biblical”.)
Headless Unicorn Guy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
“Burk Parsons Charged With Being a Jerk”
The problem with jerks is that they never see themselves as a jerk. They most likely have been jerks all their lives and find encouragement to be a pastor-jerk when enough fools get together to ordain them to ministry … thereby, releasing the jerk to be a bigger jerk in the Body of Christ. In the end, such jerks fail because jerks should never be put in the pulpit and God has a way of bringing jerks to an end.
Max(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Lowlandseer,
Thank you for that info. Why are they even allowing a man like him in the pastorate?
dee(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
IMO, a “pastor” who is not Christlike has a severe moral failing. When a “pastor” is not an example to his flock of Christian behavior and love, when he is known to them as a narcissistic jerk, he has failed the sacred office of pastor both spiritually and morally. Forgive him if he repents? Certainly. Should he be restored to ministry? Absolutely not!
Max(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
And what does it say about the grown adults who shell out their hard-earned bucks to a mountebank like Parsons? I have zero sympathy for them.
Muff Potter(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Lowlandseer,
The new paradigm. The wink and a nod excuse for sin was once the devil made me do it. Now? No winks, no nods, that’s just the way I was made. What’s that? Christ changing me? What are you going on about?
And yes, why on earth is he allowed to continue? They should have stripped him of his credentials and kicked him out. Of course, he would likely just resurface somewhere else in some other role with some other organization.
Afterburne(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
It may be that within Presbyterian as well as other traditions, skill in teaching covers a multitude of sins.
Samuel Conner(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
dee,
It’s all a bit strange. Sproul’s church only joined the PCA in 2023 and I understand that they were planning to hold a meeting a couple of days ago and again in July to discuss leaving it. Also, if it’s true that the standing committee chairman’s church is going to pay for counselling for the victims, that would be seen to be a breach of impartiality on his part as noted in their Book of Church Order.
Lowlandseer(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
“we learned that Parsons was tried over a non-flagitious matter, and he repented in 2019.”
+++++++++++++++++++
it’s ok to be an @ssh0le for Jesus as long as you’re not flagitious. sanctimoniously so.
the comedy of it all…. it’s just too much
elastigirl(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
His excuses regarding his character are no excuses.
Now, I give a good preacher this: sometimes to communicate the truth of sin and salvation accurately and forcefully you will step on toes. Most of us probably have had the experience of hearing a preacher preaching generically but it sound to us like he was preaching to us. That was the Holy Spirit using him or her.
And that isn’t at all even in the same league as being nasty to people. This dude is excusing being nasty to people.
I know one Calvinista dude bro SBC preacher who publicly, during the service, humiliated one older lady in her 80s I believe, who had fallen on snow and broken a leg. She returned to church as soon as possible. Sometimes service length was something she could handle, but sometimes the preacher told time with a calendar. One Sunday the pain got too much for her. She was seated in the back by the door, so she grabbed her walker and tried to sneak out. Would have succeeded had the preacher just kept preaching, but nope. He pointed her out, suggested if she was leaving she hurry up about it and don’t come back unless you intend to stay for the whole service.
At which point many of us decided right then we didn’t need to hear more, and left also.
linda(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Lowlandseer,
The date of joining the PCA is more likely to have been between 1973 and 1975 according to other sources. Apologies.
Lowlandseer(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
flagitious: very bad or evil, or morally wrong (Cambridge Dictionary)
heck, that’s nothing in New Calvinism ranks … they all practice a little flagitious here and there!
(by the way, you have just come up with a very applicable t-shirt slogan for the NeoCals!) 🙂
Max(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
I agree. It should always be clear what specific types of behaviour are & are not acceptable. This would have the benefit of helping pastors with less experience grow in maturity, and correct issues quickly before they become bigger problems.
It might also help in providing a concept of ‘pastoral competence’ for those who don’t have the right personality/skills to be good pastors, but might do well in a parachurch ministry role that didn’t involve personal spiritual care.
Christie24(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
This whole passage is blatantly sociopathic, to my ear.
He expresses a thorough lack of empathy, which he defends as somehow essential to the core of his being.
Hard pass.
Sandy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Samuel Conner,
Ha, if one is not even supposed to have a meal with someone like this, one shouldn’t be listening to their teaching either.
Their priorities are backwards from what Jesus taught for sure, but well inline with wordly secular motives.
What could go wrong by allowing a little sprinkling of being motivated by the world mixed in with “Biblical” teaching anyway? All for the Benjamins I guess.
Afterburne(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Sandy,
Yeah, not Christ like at all. Even if that is not your jam, who would want to hang around someone like that?
Afterburne(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Afterburne,
I don’t disagree, but in the present environment in which “mastery of theological system” seems to be the primary filter for removing people unsuitable for ministry, and “skill in teaching” seems to be the primary thing that congregations are looking for in their “shepherds”, I think that there need to be additional tests and safeguards.
The suggestion of an exhaustive list of prohibited behaviors is at one level kind of ridiculous; this is the sort of thing you do for children who have not yet internalized the ethics of the culture in which they are raised. But I think the reality is that there are adults (not all, perhaps not even many, but some, including some who are in vocational ministry) who don’t have much skill in discerning when they are harming the people with whom they interact. Some of them may not care, but for the ones who genuinely don’t want to be hurtful, but are not skilled at distinguishing help from harm, external guidance might be useful.
Samuel Conner(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Max,
“…t-shirt…”
++++++++++
oh what fun!
elastigirl(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Afterburne,
“If one is not even supposed to have a meal with someone like this, one shouldn’t be listening to their teaching either.”
All this teaching & preaching though a valid ministry, is still very much one dimensional and in urban society can easily mask the character and personality. The significant downside of supermarket mall churches where a modeled life is never evident.
Ian Docker(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Max,
Please let us know your idea!
dee(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Lowlandseer,
“This decision by the Commission was unanimous and was accompanied by prayer for TE Parson’s repentance, the glory of God, and the peace and purity of the church.”
++++++++++++
it’s good to hear it was unanimous.
but ‘the glory of God’ and praying for it…(does it have some kind of practical value?)…. color me bewildered.
elastigirl(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
here’s a clue: the NeoCal t-shirt slogan idea is hidden in elastigirl’s comment at 11:43 am today
Max(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
505339″>Samuel Conner,
Christie24,
“…exhaustive list of behavioral prohibitions.”
<a href="#comment-
"I agree. It should always be clear what specific types of behaviour are & are not acceptable."
+++++++++
or maybe they can talk to my agnostic cousins and atheist friends (in some kind of tutorial), who don't permit themselves to be unkind, nor to lie or be dishonest…
because they can't bear to treat their fellow human beings poorly, in any way that disrespects their dignity.
because these things are wrong.
they didn't need theology or doctrine to tell them these things.
it floors me that these men don't know right and wrong and require a preschool yard duty for playground behavior.
i mean, who needs this?
who needs to be in an organization led by these kinds of people, whose charter principles formed them (like multiplying orcs)?
elastigirl(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
This is Cluster B personality disordered behavior at the very minimum . He should quit and enroll himself in intensive therapy ASAP!
But no, he doesn’t see his unkind behavior as a problem. Worse, the leaders don’t see this as a problem.
I read a study that stated almost 1/3 of pastors surveyed met the diagnostic criteria of Narcissistic Personality Disorder, which explains a whole lot about the current enabling and toxic church culture.
Valerie Stewart(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
If the survey you are referencing is the research study underlying the book on pastoral narcissism, “Let Us Prey”, that statistic is not reliable (whether it is low or high is not known in the absence of a more accurate survey tool).
https://julieroys.com/study-claiming-31-of-pastors-have-clinical-narcissism-is-debunked-by-expert-researchers/
This isn’t to discount the problem of narcissism among vocational ministers, but the extent of the problem is not yet accurately quantified (at least to my awareness, perhaps this has been more recently studied with reliable survey instruments that I have not heard about).
Samuel Conner(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Looking back on several decades of doing church in America, I would say at least 25% of the church leaders I knew along the way had problems of that nature.
Max(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
I find the above quote very interesting. I believe Parsons when he said “it’s much harder being me.” It is my opinion that there is a high probability that he was SA’d as a minor by Lou Pearlman. If so, I would definitely understand what he means when he stated it’s much harder being me. It appears Pearlman was fond of Parsons. Read the following quotes and you will understand what I mean. These first quotes came from a 3 part interview of Parsons by Tim Challies. Challies has removed the stories from his web site but the 3 part series has been saved many times on The Wayback Machine. (Links provided.)
https://web.archive.org/web/20170801165725/https://www.challies.com/interviews/to-backstreet-and-back-an-interview-with-burk-parsons-part-2/
“People may have heard rumors in the past that you were an original member of the Backstreet Boys. Is this true?
Burk Unfortunately, yes, it’s true. In fact, I recall the day we were told the name of our group. Alex, Nick, Howie, Sam, and I were together in Lou Pearlman’s enormous game room (adorned with original Hollywood paraphernalia, such as a Darth Vader helmet, C3PO suit, and Starship Enterprise model hanging prominently above–everything teenage boys loved). It is there where many of our early practice sessions and conversations took place. Lou had been in collaboration with his people from the entertainment industry about the name for his new boy band. As I recall, I was sitting on the floor next to Nick Carter who was thirteen at the time, and when Lou told us our new name, “The Backstreet Boys,” we laughed so hard that we were actually rolling on the ground. We all thought it was quite possibly the worst name he could have come up with. At first, we thought Lou was joking. For years, friends of mine have mockingly referred to the group as the Back Alley Boys, Backyard Boys, Backseat Boys, and so on.”
….”All the while, we were preparing to sign contracts in a few weeks just prior to our first photo shoot on Cocoa Beach (incidentally, the attorneys demanded that no personal photographs be taken prior to our signing of the contracts). My mother, while very pleased that I had made the cut and that I was on my way to stardom, she was growing somewhat suspicious of Lou Pearlman’s character (a suspicion which later proved to be insightful as Lou was repeatedly alleged to have had naughty associations with several young boys).”
….”So, with those questions in my mind and my self-developed conclusions to those questions, I walked into Lou’s office one week before contracts were to be signed and told him that this wasn’t what God had for my life. I explained to him as he sat behind his desk, breathing heavily, that I believed God had other plans for me and that I believed I would be in ministry some day. That’s really about all I said; it was one of the hardest things I have ever had to do in my life (even to this day). Lou Pearlman, a lapsed Jew, first cousin of Art Garfunkel (kind of ironic), and self-made millionaire (or so it seemed at the time), looked at me, smiled, and said, “We love you Burk, you can’t leave us; we’re you’re family.” He knew me well enough to know that those words wouldn’t convince me, and I recall looking down as if I had disappointed him, and he went on to say, this time using the same theology that many Christians had used with me: “Maybe this is God’s way of using you. Maybe this is God’s plan for you. How do you know what He wants you to do? You just need to think about this a little more. It will all be okay, Burk. Next week things are really going to start to get exciting with our first photo shoot…” I then remember standing up and saying to him (and there was no one else in the room) Lou, I just can’t do it–I’m sorry.” He then stood up and said, “you must do it, Burk.” His face turned red and he huffed and puffed (he was a big guy; he’s not as big now, literally, since he’s been in jail for the past year awaiting his arraignment for fraud, embezzlement, and a host of other state, federal, and international charges; it’s all very sad). He then proceeded to remind me of all he had invested in me and in the rest of the group. By this time the rest of the guys could hear what was going on as they sat in the game room outside Lou’s office. He was yelling, and he was beyond upset. In tears, I thanked him for all he had done and how said how sorry I was for letting him down and leaving. I walked out, said goodbye, and waved to the guys whom I dearly came to love and care for and drove home to Sarasota. It was one of the longest two-hour drives of my life.”
==========
https://web.archive.org/web/20250315000000*/http://www.challies.com:80/interviews/to-backstreet-and-back-an-interview-with-burk-parsons-part-3
Lou called me at home, and I had not spoken with him since I left him and the guys that day at his home in 1993. It was now 1995. The Backstreet Boys had just started their first European tour, if I recall, and they were just getting to be known. Lou acted as if nothing had ever happened and asked me to come to Orlando to catch up and talk about the future. His offer was completely unexpected. That Saturday afternoon I visited him we met in his game room; he sat in his big chair and I sat on his sofa; he leaned toward me and said, “Burk, I’m going to give you another chance. I’m starting a new group, and it will be better and more successful than the Backstreet Boys. We now know exactly what to do and how to create a band that will rise to instant popularity.” He then said this (I was stunned): “I want you to be the first member of this group. We will build the group around you, and you will help us choose the guys in the group. You are no longer a minor; you will need to move to Orlando as soon as possible, finish school from here. I will get you a house, a car, a salary, and any thing else you need. Within a couple of years,” he promised, “you’ll be a multi-millionaire.”
He could tell I was excited. We spoke for a while about all that I was involved with at church and how this might be God’s second opportunity for me to fulfill my calling to be a witness for Him in the world. Lou had become quite a theologian. So, he gave me one week to think about it and told me to call him by the next Saturday.
==============
https://web.archive.org/web/20230419004735/https://www.challies.com/interviews/to-backstreet-and-back-an-interview-with-burk-parsons/
===========
Excerpt below from Vanity Fair – https://web.archive.org/web/20250126092704/vanityfair.com/news/2007/11/pearlman200711
CRIME
NOVEMBER 2007 ISSUE
Mad About the Boys
“Until he fled the country in January, accused of embezzling more than $300 million, Lou Pearlman was famous as the impresario behind the Backstreet Boys and ‘NSync. Turns out his investors weren’t the only victims, colleagues reveal: Pearlman’s passion for boy bands was also a passion for boys.”
“What no one knows, however, is that Pearlman’s sins appear to have been far more sordid than conning kindly grandmothers. What no one knows, because it is described here for the first time, is that while the King of the Boy Bands was smitten with the music industry and the millions he made there, while he adored his gold records and his television appearances, what Lou Pearlman loved at least as much were the attentions of attractive young male singers.
Some, especially the teenagers, shrugged and giggled when he showed them pornographic movies or jumped naked onto their beds in the morning to wrestle and play. Others, it appears, didn’t get off so easily. These were the young singers seen emerging from his bedroom late at night, buttoning their pants, sheepish looks on their faces. Some deny anything improper ever happened. But the parents of at least one, a member of the Backstreet Boys, complained. And for any number of young men who sought to join the world’s greatest boy bands, Big Poppa’s attentions were an open secret, the price some paid for fame.
“Some guys joked about it; I remember [one singer] asking me, ‘Have you let Lou blow you yet?'” says Steve Mooney, an aspiring singer who served as Pearlman’s assistant and lived in his home for two years. “I would absolutely say the guy was a sexual predator. All the talent knew what Lou’s game was. If they say no, they’re lying to you.”
To a number of his former band members, Pearlman seemed so enamored of his male singers that it called into question his motivations for entering the music business in the first place. “Honestly, I don’t think Lou ever thought we would become stars,” says Rich Cronin, lead singer of the Pearlman boy band Lyte Funky Ones (LFO). “I just think he wanted cute guys around him; this was all an excuse. And then lightning crazily struck and an empire was created. It was all dumb luck. I think his motives for getting into music were very different.”
Todd Wilhelm(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Valerie Stewart,
“He should quit and enrol himself in intensive therapy ASAP”!
Going by what he has shared and others have determined, for his own welfare and that of others, one would aggree adding that it also should be a mandatory duty of care requirement within the church & denomination.
In my neck of the woods and denomination, if such a person is forthcoming in one on one mandatory supervision and quarterly group codes of conduct sessions, overall duty of care for all concerned followed by suitability for pastoral ministry is the only subject matter.
Ian Docker(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Todd Wilhelm,
Thank you for this reminder of his past. It sounds like Parsons needs counseling. His painful past makes this even more imperative. No one forced him to be a pastor. He should take a step back and rethink his trajectory.
dee(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Todd Wilhelm,
Wow! I had no idea of the connections. Thank you for that explanation.
EW66(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
It’s a variant of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.
As a 3000-year-old piece of Jewish wisdom literature puts it,
“A Fool is Wise in his own eyes.”
Headless Unicorn Guy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Christainese street cred.
AKA Virtue Signalling.
Shows how Holy and Godly they themselves are.
Headless Unicorn Guy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Reminds me of Christian Cult Watch ministries of the 1970s.
Their definition of CULT(TM) was 100% Theology, Theology, and Theology.
Completely ignoring any and all abusive “cult” behavior towards their people. If the group’s Theology was Correct, it was NOT a Cult(TM).
And while the Christian Cult Watchers were parsing Theology under an electron microscope, abusive churches such as what appear on this blog sailed right through. Even waving their “Church, Not CULT” status as a weapon to further abuse their people.
i.e.
“If You Question What I Say Or Do
YOU REBEL AGAINST THE FATHER, TOO!”
— Steve Taylor, “I Manipulate”
Headless Unicorn Guy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
You know “Flagitious” sounds a lot like “Flatulence”?
“POOT!”
Headless Unicorn Guy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
elastigirl,
Orcs. Now that is an apt description of some of these folks.
Afterburne(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
dee,
If you take on face value what Todd posted (I have no reason to doubt any of it), this whole situation further justifies the importance of TWW..
If Burk Parson was abused as a child, and it contributes to his “issues”, in this case as a pastor, which should be supposedly “contantly being renewed by the Holly Spirt”, how much more are the other kids abused by the Church, and subsequently discarded by the church.. in need of our support???
Note, I was not necessiarly being sarcastic in my phrase “contantly being renewed by the Holly Spirt”.. more that we have all been taught this, and I really think we should expect this in our “Christian leader”… as opposed to people like Jerry Faldwell Jr, who recently recived a 10s of million dollar settlement from Liberty after being fired… sigh..
Jeffrey J Chalmers(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
It’s as funny as an old Marx Bros. film.
Muff Potter(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
“Burk Parsons, no relation to Dee, has been convicted, once again. Here is my post from March 2025. Burk Parsons May Not Be Flagitious, But He’s in Trouble Once Again. When we last left Parsons, he was about to be tried by the Central Florida Presbytery.”
This made me laugh. Perfect. It really is like a soap opera somedays, all that comes out about certain pastors.
JJallday(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
If Parsons was SA by Pearlmam, it makes sense. Those abused often become abusers themselves. Since Pearlman is dead, only Parsons can shed light on that.
Ras al Ghul(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
EW66(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Todd Wilhelm,
If all this is true, and there’s no reason to think it isn’t, should he not be given the opportunity to unburden himself at TWW? I ask this seriously.
Lowlandseer(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Most definitely.
Todd Wilhelm(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Thanks for bringing this matter to my attention, Samuel. I was not aware of it. The link you provided to Julie Roy’s article was well worth the read. I have the book “Let us Prey” and should probably pitch it in the bin!
Todd Wilhelm(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
I wasn’t aware of this, either. Thanks for sharing!
Valerie Stewart(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Lowlandseer,
Todd Wilhelm,
An issue that I have never before considered (which I suppose is mark of how clueless I am) is that childhood trauma is pretty common (failed marriages, for starters, but there are all sorts of other possibilities, abuse, bullying, economic hardship); the ways that marks people who later in life pursue ministry vocations could have significant consequences for them and for the congregations they serve.
Nobody knows the trouble they’ve seen.
Samuel Conner(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
I only read part of the interview with Parsons above, but I found it relatable & confronting. Some parts of it could have been written about people I know, or even from my own experience of dealing with professional Christianity. To me it says a lot about the way Christian culture treats young, gifted, & idealistic people who sincerely want to serve God.
The idea of being ‘called to ministry’ seems to be based on targeting young men with knowledge of the Bible who are well spoken, and ‘challenging’ them to ‘commit fully to Christ’. This is sometimes done using pressure or manipulation, often when a person is vulnerable & looking for a sense of meaning or validation. They are quickly pushed into the ‘professional ministry’ pipeline, without allowing time & space for them to grow in maturity.
It also made me think about my experiences as a woman, & how little difference there can be sometimes between the values in the secular entertainment industry & the way Christian culture treats women. I used to think as a newer Christian that professional pastors/teachers must be super godly & wise, but later realised this is often not the case.
I think this shows how broken the Christian system is, & how this can ultimately lead to the kind of spiritual fallout covered on TWW. I pray that Parsons would find repentance, healing, and restoration in his personal life. And I hope that Christian culture in general can become a place where abuse of any kind is not acceptable.
Christie24(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Yes. There is a huge difference between being “called to ministry” and “going into ministry”. One can go into ministry as a career without truly being called by God. In my estimation, many young men take the career path you note without being fully equipped and committed to a pastoral role. Without the spiritual maturity to hold that sacred office, the ‘real’ man will eventually come out. As has been noted before on TWW, some of the best pastors in the American church were called into ministry later in life. Seasoned and tested by secular jobs, life experiences, and a demonstrated relationship with Christ, they fulfill their calling well to love and truly pastor congregations entrusted to them.
Max(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Pressure. How many countless “evangelical organisations” piled on the pressure? Bad relationships come from the bigger people – that’s called codependency and it’s exactly what Jesus came to redeem Burk or any of us from – Psalm 1 describes the entire thing.
Be a (real) witness for Him in the world = sit, live, think. NOT about allowing the “vocations director” to extract the last pound of flesh out of you.
Pearlmann = scorner (PLUS EVERYTHING ELSE).
Whoever browbeat Roy Clements = scorner, not convinced in their own minds. Whoever browbeat Josh Harris = scorner, not convinced in their own minds. Whoever browbeat a 17 year old such as Ravi ON HIS HOSPITAL BED = scorner, not convinced in their own minds.
Michael in UK(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Valerie Stewart,
Valerie – stop worriting yourself who else is “narcissistic” – and start looking who nearer home is CODEPENDENT namely with the escape route Jesus has entirely promised in Psalm 1, especially when discipling with the Whole of the Gospel phenomenon. (And agnostics can join CoDA.)
Michael in UK(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
I’ve often wondered how much of that influences the patriarchal authoritarian nature of the New Calvinist movement in regard to the treatment of female believers. The “beauty of complementarity” has been an ugly thing for some women ensnared by NeoCal pastors/churches.
Max(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Very true. If you have watched the film “Spotlight,” you may recall a scene where the reporter is interviewing one of the survivors with his attorney present. The attorney makes a comment that his client is one of the lucky ones because he is still alive!
I have read about, heard, and talked with SA survivors. Many are chemically dependent, some have attempted suicide, some have exhibited abnormal sexual behavior (such as exposing themselves).
Thank God if you’ve been brought up by good parents. I pray I may increase in compassion for those who have not. Truly, nobody knows the trouble they’ve seen.
Todd Wilhelm(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
A prime example of this is the yearly “CrossCon” that takes place over Christmas break. College students are pressured to make a decision to become a missionary. I believe John Piper has said that unless God tells you otherwise, you should be a missionary. David Platt tearfully pleads with conference attendees to become “Radical” followers of Jesus and take the Gospel to unreached nations.
I am skeptical of the results. It reminds of when I was a junior high kid and attended bible camp for one week. Most of us returned as “changed” people, all fired up for Christ. The “spiritual high” lasted for a week or two and then life returned to normal.
Todd Wilhelm(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
CrossCon is another avenue by the New Calvinists to indoctrinate young people and motivate them to join their movement. It’s more about spreading reformed theology than Gospel ministry. They need new recruits to accomplish their goal of Calvinizing the American church. CrossCon 2025 speakers include John Piper, David Platt, and Kevin DeYoung … whew, it doesn’t get any more NeoCal than that!
Max(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Confirming all of the above. I would add that the damage goes beyond just the victim but also has multigenerational consequences, both up and down the family tree.
Good parents is a huge help, but for some not sufficient. A personal, saving relationship with Jesus can make all the difference. Personal observation.
And what is it with music and SA? I’ve seen it up close and afar.
Grumpy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Lowlandseer,
Absolutely. And if he doesn’t want to yet – and / or chooses somewhere else – we should be generous with his space-time let alone ours. And we have to give him room to use his own discretion how to deal with his denomination authorities in proportion to the whole of the real facts (that affected eeveryone) in place.
It’s not a facile matter to ask “why didn’t you speak up sooner yourself” when someone else pulled – to say the least – jerkish and flagitious behaviour (based on their own living a lie) on him in turn, in the past.
I myself was in a pincer movement for 28 years, on top of big chunks of lifetime being strung along by other stringers-along (and saw ill befall my peers during those times).
New Reformed Characters place corporations (interlinked by back scratching) above individuals, and Psalm 1 is about our escaping unequal yoking in Holy Spirit power – the entire purpose of Jesus’ suffering it and ascending.
Grumpy,
Ultra deep bass, mechanised, at hundreds of decibels, punishes the glands near the base of the spine – because it is intended to. (Are the eco contingent going to query their “energy” use?)
The contrast with say Mendelssohn speaks for itself.
Michael in UK(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
It is certainly a high pressure sales tactic, with not only strong emotional appeals, but spiritual ones as well. {Time share sales people would do well to emulate the pressure to “serve God” that is placed on high school/college aged Christians who are looking for ways to demonstrate their faith, love God, and have a meaningful career.)
This is not limited to the Calvinista crowd. Paige Patterson used to say that there was no higher calling in this world than to be a (Southern Baptist) preacher.
This is completely different from what Spurgeon used to tell people who would come to him about serving in ministry. He would say (I am paraphrasing): if you can do anything else, do it.
I have grown to appreciate and love the Lutheran understanding of vocation. I would recommend anyone questioning whether they were “called” or not to find and listen to a talk by Rod Rosenbladt or Uwe Siemon-Nette on vocation.
Burwell Stark(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Meredith McKinney,
Yes, they vote July 20.
Thom Aquinus(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
dee,
Because he is RC Sproul’s annointed jerk.
Thom Aquinus(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
When I was exploring churches in the mid-Eighties, one of them was a Mega (EV Free Fullerton during the Chuck Swindoll era) with a Singles Group. Like most such groups, they had an embarrassing ritual called “Icebreakers” at the start of their meetings. This icebreaker was the question “If you weren’t you, what would you be?” I was the only non-GUBA (“Grew up Borna Again”) in the group. I was the only one who didn’t answer “Pastor” or “Missionary”.
And every church has at least one busybody with the Gift of Discernment(TM) and a direct private revelation of YOUR Vocation, direct from God. In the RCC, such Prophesying terminology is that YOU Are To Become a Priest. Personal example (from someone who was seriously into Clericalism) was being told that my inability to have a girlfriend (let alone get married) means “GOD IS CALLING YOU TO BECOME A PRIEST!” in so many words.
Headless Unicorn Guy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Your psyche was stirred, but the inner man was not.
Max(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
P.S. Didn’t Deep Throat Driscoll say something similar? That if you were single, you were supposed to become a Missionary to some faraway land and Witness until the locals put you int the stewpot, Ooga Booga. While the other Christians who WEREN’T failures – the Marrieds – stayed at home to Focus on their Families.
P.P.S. And who reading this blog takes The Pious Piper’s words seriously?
Headless Unicorn Guy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
i.e. You came down, withdrawals kicked in, and you needed your next fix of Bible Camp.
Dopamine is one helluva high.
Headless Unicorn Guy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
They’re not Clergy.
They don’t count.
Headless Unicorn Guy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
What my church (RCC) calls “Second Vocations”.
The advantage of which is Second Vocations bring real-world experience into their Vocation.
Headless Unicorn Guy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Yep, you’re right.
Todd Wilhelm(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Yep, you are correct. Unfortunately, my good friend was sexually abused by our pastor at the same camp. I only learned about it 9 years ago.
https://thouarttheman.org/2016/08/12/4602/
Todd Wilhelm(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
But if you don’t want to be so Radical that you end up in the stewpot, do not despair, because there is another way out. You can Just Do Something, which includes the idea of picking someone, anyone, to marry & have kids with. They only need to be an unmarried Christian of the opposite gender who is not related to you. Then you can comfortably sit on the sidelines as your less fortunate brethren walk bravely into the firing line, prepared to give up their very lives for the cause.
Christie24(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Headless Unicorn Guy,
sigh…sigh…sigh..
Jeffrey J Chalmers(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Headless Unicorn Guy,
Unfortunately, I think you are correct…. sigh…
Jeffrey J Chalmers(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Wanna’ know a secret?
Those kinds of guys don’t feel those kinds of ‘burdens’.
They are narcissist sociopaths plain and simple.
Muff Potter(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
When they are exposed, they cry without tears and move on down the road unrepentant and unchanged.
Max(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
From the O P “Just moments ago, New Life Church’s statement on the departure of Brady Boyd.”
Late to the party – I just saw the feed of some elder reading this to the sheeple… really interesting in the video. He makes several slips of the tongue, and they’re playing this annoying altar-call music in the background. Beyond this, the statement itself is, IMO, satanic to the core. Not demonic like Morris would think, but satanic — aiming to manipulate the pewsitters. Not calling lies “lies”, making the former pastor out a hero, not addressing the status of any current leaders who hired him, on and on.
Satin(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
something I just ran across on YouTube:
WOLF IN SHEPHERD’S CLOTHING
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/O_JmABOFHV0
Headless Unicorn Guy(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)
Satin,
Going back to when the two of them were hired: they were supposed to be hiring one person but it was obvious to them from the start that they had to have the pair of them?
Michael in UK(Reply & quote selected text) (Reply to this comment)